IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Haskins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Rochester Mayo High USHS-MN 23 22 24 46 2.000 0.5384 0.5139 0.4858 0.4636
2015-16 Austin Bruins NAHL 24 2 1 3 0.125 0.0495 0.0513 — —
2016-17 Austin Bruins NAHL 55 9 8 17 0.309 0.1225 0.1203 0.3245 0.3185
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 8 1 1 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2017-18 · Gustavus Adolphus
+214.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29150
Forward overall
#1339
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Bell
Hamilton · 2002-03
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Dunagan
Saint John's · 2012-13
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Fiorino
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.