IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Dunagan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 54 5 10 15 0.278 0.1031 0.1066 0.2941 0.3040
2012-13 Jamestown Ironmen NAHL 60 22 15 37 0.617 0.2290 0.2252 0.6530 0.6422
2013-14 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 60 14 26 40 0.667 0.2475 0.2310 0.7059 0.6588
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Saint John's D3 — SR 26 6 6 12 0.462
2016-17 Saint John's D3 — JR 22 1 6 7 0.318
2015-16 Saint John's D3 — SO 27 8 5 13 0.481
2014-15 Saint John's D3 — FR 23 5 7 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2014-15 · Saint John's
+166.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19102
Forward overall
#728
Forward born in 1993
#1748
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Barone
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Trathen
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Francone
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.