← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Barone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 42 16 21 37 0.881 0.1056 0.1086 0.2023 0.2080
2015-16 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Premier-Classic 28 11 10 21 0.750 0.2252 0.2250 0.6178 0.6172
2016-17 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 36 6 21 27 0.750 0.2252 0.2140 0.6178 0.5871
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast GR 27 20 14 34 1.259
2020-21 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 8 2 5 7 0.875
2019-20 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 24 8 18 26 1.083
2018-19 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 26 12 10 22 0.846
2017-18 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 25 12 10 22 0.880
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2017-18 · Plymouth State
+370.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20478
Forward overall
#851
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Mary's · 2005-06
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.