IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Haar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-08-16 Country: USA
2011 · Round 7, Pick #207  ·  Washington Capitals Washington Capitals
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Fargo Force USHL 51 7 16 23 0.451 0.2660 0.2825 1.3545 1.4383
2013-14 Portland Winterhawks WHL 61 7 38 45 0.738 0.3589 0.3276 1.8101 1.6523
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig SO 22 3 6 9 0.409
2011-12 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig FR 36 1 7 8 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2011-12 · Western Michigan
-16.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2772
Defenseman overall
#517
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Selleck
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Olson
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Micale
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.