IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Castan Sommer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-10-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 17 0 2 2 0.118 0.0694 0.0674 0.3529 0.3429
2011-12 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 60 32 27 59 0.983 0.3613 0.3471 1.0392 0.9983
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Holy Cross D1 AHA SR 36 8 10 18 0.500
2014-15 Holy Cross D1 AHA JR 36 6 5 11 0.306
2013-14 Holy Cross D1 AHA SO 39 9 9 18 0.462
2012-13 Holy Cross D1 AHA FR 37 6 11 17 0.460
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2012-13 · Holy Cross
+128.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18951
Forward overall
#694
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Flanagan
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Mazur
Endicott · 2018-19
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
George Kolovos
Wentworth · 2023-24
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.