IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Lappin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Tri-City Storm USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Tri-City Storm USHL 50 6 9 15 0.300 0.1910 0.1980 0.8990 0.9319
2012-13 — USHL 59 7 7 14 0.237 0.1511 0.1486 0.7111 0.6992
2013-14 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 43 8 17 25 0.581 0.3702 0.3467 1.7423 1.6318
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Brown D1 ECAC SR 29 6 4 10 0.345
2016-17 Brown D1 ECAC JR 24 1 2 3 0.125
2015-16 Brown D1 ECAC SO 15 1 2 3 0.200
2014-15 Brown D1 ECAC FR 14 0 7 7 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2014-15 · Brown
+118.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13653
Forward overall
#569
Forward born in 1994
#2087
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Reed
Curry · 2009-10
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rusty Masters
Elmira · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Whitelaw
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.