Gabe Guertler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-03 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2011-12	Fargo Force	USHL	57	9	19	28	0.491	0.2898	0.3190	1.4753	1.6240
2012-13	Fargo Force	USHL	60	31	20	51	0.850	0.5014	0.5252	2.5529	2.6743
2014-15	Soo Greyhounds	OHL	67	27	30	57	0.851	0.4921	0.4661	2.1859	2.0705
2015-16	Soo Greyhounds	OHL	68	26	42	68	1.000	0.5785	0.5190	2.5695	2.3051
2016-17	Univ. of Prince Edward Island	USports-M	27	8	6	14	0.518	0.2736	0.2923	1.5197	1.6234
2017-18	Univ. of Prince Edward Island	USports-M	26	10	12	22	0.846	0.4465	0.4567	2.4802	2.5367
2018-19	Univ. of Prince Edward Island	USports-M	29	11	16	27	0.931	0.4912	0.4768	2.7288	2.6485
2019-20	Univ. of Prince Edward Island	USports-M	0	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2013-14	Minnesota	D1	BigTen	FR	24	2	3	5	0.208

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.38

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.21

2013-14 · Minnesota

-45.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

88%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7502

Forward overall

#360

Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Christopher Miraldo

Westfield State · 2022-23

1.037 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Zach Dill

Salem State · 2021-22

1.111 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Lucas Signoretti

Buffalo State · 2023-24

1.120 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.