← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Auk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-02-18 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Lukko · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 34 1 9 10 0.294 0.1735 0.1800 0.8833 0.9163
2013-14 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 59 10 19 29 0.491 0.2899 0.2872 1.4762 1.4624
2018-19 Lukko Liiga 47 1 9 10 0.213 0.5320 0.5986 1.8293 2.0583
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Michigan Tech D1 WCHA SR 44 9 22 31 0.705
2016-17 Michigan Tech D1 WCHA JR 44 5 18 23 0.523
2015-16 Michigan Tech D1 WCHA SO 36 4 13 17 0.472
2014-15 Michigan Tech D1 WCHA FR 26 3 10 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2014-15 · Michigan Tech
+116.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 21 comparables)

14%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
86%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2043
Defenseman overall
#438
Defenseman born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2013-14
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.