← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alec McCrea Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-01-12 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Düsseldorfer EG · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Janesville Jets NAHL 50 1 1 2 0.040 0.0158 0.0177 0.0420 0.0471
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 50 1 7 8 0.160 0.0984 0.1016 0.4714 0.4867
2013-14 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 59 7 14 21 0.356 0.2188 0.2156 1.0486 1.0334
2014-15 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 59 3 14 17 0.288 0.1771 0.1658 0.8488 0.7948
2021-22 Iserlohn Roosters DEL 32 1 6 7 0.219 0.2393 0.2554
2022-23 Düsseldorfer EG DEL 56 6 15 21 0.375 0.4101 0.4257
2023-24 Düsseldorfer EG DEL 49 4 18 22 0.449 0.4910 0.4845
2024-25 Düsseldorfer EG DEL 48 2 14 16 0.333 0.3645 0.3429
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Cornell D1 ECAC SR 36 3 9 12 0.333
2017-18 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 32 5 7 12 0.375
2016-17 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 35 1 9 10 0.286
2015-16 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 34 3 12 15 0.441
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2015-16 · Cornell
+151.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1634
Defenseman overall
#379
Defenseman born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2015-16
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2024-25
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.