| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Frölunda HC U20 | SHL-J20 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.091 | 0.0505 | 0.0547 | 0.1211 | 0.1311 |
| 2011-12 | Frölunda HC U20 | SuperElit | 42 | 3 | 15 | 18 | 0.429 | 0.1691 | 0.1771 | 0.5821 | 0.6098 |
| 2012-13 | — | USHL | 45 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.156 | 0.0918 | 0.0903 | 0.4673 | 0.4596 |
| 2013-14 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 43 | 3 | 13 | 16 | 0.372 | 0.2195 | 0.2056 | 1.1176 | 1.0470 |
| 2014-15 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 43 | 3 | 13 | 16 | 0.372 | 0.2195 | 0.1948 | 1.1176 | 0.9920 |
| 2018-19 | Västerviks IK | Allsvenskan | 32 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.156 | 0.3905 | 0.3927 | 1.4655 | 1.4736 |
| 2019-20 | Västerviks IK | Allsvenskan | 39 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.103 | 0.2565 | 0.2565 | 0.9626 | 0.9626 |
| 2020-21 | HC Vita Hästen | Allsvenskan | 40 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.225 | 0.5625 | 0.5625 | 2.1109 | 2.1109 |
| 2021-22 | MoDo Hockey | Allsvenskan | 32 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.125 | 0.3125 | 0.2738 | 1.1727 | 1.0275 |
| 2022-23 | MoDo Hockey | Allsvenskan | 49 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.143 | 0.3573 | 0.2930 | 1.3407 | 1.0994 |
| 2023-24 | MoDo Hockey | SHL | 44 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.068 | 0.1705 | 0.1450 | 0.8899 | 0.7570 |
| 2024-25 | Västerås IK | Allsvenskan | 42 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.095 | 0.2380 | 0.1742 | 0.8932 | 0.6538 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | UMass Lowell | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 19 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.105 |
| 2016-17 | UMass Lowell | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 18 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.056 |
| 2015-16 | UMass Lowell | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 35 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.257 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.