IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dwyer Tschantz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-22 Country: USA
2014 · Round 7, Pick #202  ·  St. Louis Blues St. Louis Blues
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Indiana Ice USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Indiana Ice USHL 52 24 20 44 0.846 0.4992 0.4967 2.5415 2.5288
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Cornell D1 ECAC SR 12 0 3 3 0.250
2016-17 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 15 1 5 6 0.400
2015-16 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 20 2 3 5 0.250
2014-15 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 19 2 3 5 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.43
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2014-15 · Cornell
-38.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5352
Forward overall
#281
Forward born in 1995
#280
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Frank Vatrano
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ UMass
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
John Stevens
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Austin Ortega
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Suess
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sheldon Dries
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sascha Figi
Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rihards Marenis
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.