| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | — | NTDP-U18 | 53 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 0.566 | 0.4502 | 0.4602 | 2.1198 | 2.1668 |
| 2011-12 | — | NTDP-U18 | 60 | 16 | 19 | 35 | 0.583 | 0.4640 | 0.4504 | 2.1846 | 2.1207 |
| 2012-13 | — | NTDP-U18 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.800 | 0.6363 | 0.5844 | 2.9962 | 2.7520 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | UMass | D1 | — | SO | 36 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 0.778 |
| 2013-14 | UMass | D1 | — | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.