← New Search ↗ Social Card

Geordan Buffoline Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 2 0 2 2 1.000 0.2310 0.2439 0.4893 0.5166
2018-19 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 44 17 24 41 0.932 0.2152 0.2164 0.4559 0.4585
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 46 34 35 69 1.500 0.3465 0.3465 0.7339 0.7339
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 23 1 8 9 0.391
2022-23 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 12 1 3 4 0.333
2021-22 University of New England D3 CNE 7 0 1 1 0.143
2020-21 University of New England D1 CNE FR 3 2 3 5 1.667
2020-21 University of New England D3 CNE FR 3 2 3 5 1.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.67
2020-21 · University of New England
+756.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8594
Forward overall
#370
Forward born in 1999
#71
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2008-09
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
1.300 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2005-06
0.621 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.