IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Geordan Buffoline Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 2 0 2 2 1.000 0.2146 0.2266 0.4897 0.5170
2018-19 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 44 17 24 41 0.932 0.2000 0.2011 0.4563 0.4589
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 46 34 35 69 1.500 0.3219 0.3219 0.7346 0.7346
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 23 1 8 9 0.391
2022-23 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 12 1 3 4 0.333
2020-21 New England D3 — FR 3 2 3 5 1.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.67
2020-21 · New England
+821.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15632
Forward overall
#564
Forward born in 1999
#81
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vince Perreault
Westfield State · 2008-09
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Vilho Saariluoma
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
1.300 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
David Titanic
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.