← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Reifler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-09-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Bay State Bobcats NA3HL 47 36 64 100 2.128 0.2564 0.2804 0.6721 0.7350
2017-18 Bay State Bobcats NA3HL 36 33 57 90 2.500 0.3013 0.3142 0.7898 0.8237
2018-19 Cornwall Colts CCHL 19 0 3 3 0.158 0.0451 0.0446 0.1222 0.1208
2019-20 NA3HL 22 13 19 32 1.454 0.1753 0.1753 0.4595 0.4595
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Elmira D3 UCHC GR 25 14 14 28 1.120
2023-24 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 29 11 13 24 0.828
2022-23 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 25 6 7 13 0.520
2021-22 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 26 9 16 25 0.962
2020-21 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 15 8 8 16 1.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.07
2020-21 · Elmira
+717.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25588
Forward overall
#1064
Forward born in 1999
#326
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2011-12
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2011-12
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.