IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Colvard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Austin Bruins NAHL 12 2 4 6 0.500 0.1857 0.1864 0.5294 0.5314
2012-13 Austin Bruins NAHL 50 11 17 28 0.560 0.2079 0.1983 0.5929 0.5654
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 26 12 10 22 0.846
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 28 4 10 14 0.500
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 20 1 5 6 0.300
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 25 2 4 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Stout
+44.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20395
Forward overall
#883
Forward born in 1992
#1956
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Schrotenboer
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2011-12
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tucker Coborn
Concordia · 2011-12
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kent Bostrom
Bethel · 2004-05
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.