IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Hanson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Minneapolis USHS-MN 26 10 14 24 0.923 0.1137 0.1137 0.2242 0.2242
2020-21 Minneapolis USHS-MN 13 4 13 17 1.308 0.1611 0.1611 0.3176 0.3176
2021-22 Minneapolis USHS-MN 31 27 31 58 1.871 0.2305 0.2305 0.4545 0.4545
2022-23 — NA3HL 39 19 24 43 1.103 0.1219 0.1217 0.3493 0.3487
2023-24 Pueblo Bulls NCDC 50 16 38 54 1.080 0.2496 0.2391 0.8733 0.8367
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC — 24 1 5 6 0.250
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC — 9 1 0 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2024-25 · Concordia
-32.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6271
Forward overall
#210
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Valadao
Curry · 2013-14
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Mooney
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Troy York
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.