Hayden Shaw Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-05 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2013-14	Waterloo Black Hawks	USHL	53	8	21	29	0.547	0.3228	0.3407	1.6435	1.7346
2014-15	—	USHL	46	6	36	42	0.913	0.5386	0.5419	2.7421	2.7591
2022-23	Nürnberg Ice Tigers	DEL	46	7	11	18	0.391	0.9782	1.0837	3.3175	3.6753
2023-24	Nürnberg Ice Tigers	DEL	40	3	9	12	0.300	0.7500	0.7924	2.5435	2.6873
2024-25	Nürnberg Ice Tigers	DEL	46	2	10	12	0.261	0.6522	0.6591	2.2120	2.2355

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2018-19	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	SR	37	3	7	10	0.270
2017-18	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	JR	40	3	10	13	0.325
2016-17	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	SO	28	2	6	8	0.286
2015-16	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	FR	32	2	4	6	0.188

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.44

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.19

2015-16 · North Dakota

-57.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

90%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2675

Defenseman overall

#540

Defenseman born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Woodward

SUNY Oswego · 2002-03

1.226 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Lucas Signoretti

Buffalo State · 2024-25

1.120 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Cole Hepler

Lebanon Valley · 2015-16

1.280 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.