Nick Master Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-28 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2013-14	Cedar Rapids RoughRiders	USHL	27	4	9	13	0.481	0.2840	0.2805	1.4461	1.4284
2014-15	Tri-City Storm	USHL	56	23	19	42	0.750	0.4424	0.4152	2.2526	2.1143
2023-24	EHC Freiburg	DEL2	42	16	27	43	1.024	1.3715	1.2536	1.8371	1.6792

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2018-19	UMass Lowell	D1	HockeyEast	SR	37	6	10	16	0.432
2017-18	UMass Lowell	D1	HockeyEast	JR	34	3	10	13	0.382
2016-17	UMass Lowell	D1	HockeyEast	SO	40	4	11	15	0.375
2015-16	UMass Lowell	D1	HockeyEast	FR	39	8	16	24	0.615

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.31

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.62

2015-16 · UMass Lowell

+99.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#8585

Forward overall

#388

Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom

University of New England · 2016-17

1.654 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Tim Coffman

Utica · 2023-24

1.480 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Jeremy Dawes

St. Scholastica · 2007-08

1.036 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.