IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alec Rauhauser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-03-07 Country: USA
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 35 1 5 6 0.171 0.1054 0.1047 0.5050 0.5014
2014-15 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 59 7 30 37 0.627 0.3855 0.3638 1.8476 1.7438
2015-16 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 58 5 32 37 0.638 0.3921 0.3519 1.8794 1.6865
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SR 38 11 24 35 0.921
2018-19 Bowling Green D1 WCHA JR 41 4 22 26 0.634
2017-18 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 41 9 30 39 0.951
2016-17 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 39 5 17 22 0.564
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2016-17 · Bowling Green
+67.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Armour
Adrian · 2014-15
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Yann Poirier
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.030 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Dawes
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.