IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alec Rauhauser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-03-07 Country: USA
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 35 1 5 6 0.171 0.1011 0.1004 0.5148 0.5112
2014-15 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 59 7 30 37 0.627 0.3699 0.3491 1.8834 1.7776
2015-16 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 58 5 32 37 0.638 0.3763 0.3377 1.9159 1.7193
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SR 38 11 24 35 0.921
2018-19 Bowling Green D1 WCHA JR 41 4 22 26 0.634
2017-18 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 41 9 30 39 0.951
2016-17 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 39 5 17 22 0.564
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2016-17 · Bowling Green
+74.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Loza
Suffolk · 2001-02
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Kneeland
Lake Forest · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.