IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Fritz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — USHL 44 1 4 5 0.114 0.0670 0.0668 0.3347 0.3338
2014-15 Coquitlam Express BCHL 55 8 30 38 0.691 0.2662 0.2596 1.0067 0.9818
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Utica D1 — SR 29 11 28 39 1.345
2019-20 Utica D3 UCHC SR 29 11 28 39 1.345
2018-19 Utica D1 — JR 29 4 22 26 0.897
2018-19 Utica D3 UCHC JR 29 4 22 26 0.897
2017-18 Utica D3 UCHC SO 26 5 12 17 0.654
2016-17 Canisius D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#7959
Defenseman overall
#1269
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Hanson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Kolb
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Omar Mullan
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.