← New Search ↗ Social Card

Teemu Pulkkinen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-13 Country: Finland
2010 · Round 4, Pick #111  ·  Detroit Red Wings Detroit Red Wings
Signed Professionally
Jukurit · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Kiekko-Espoo U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 45 20 25 45 1.000 0.5420 0.5259 1.5123 1.4674
2014-15 Kiekko-Espoo U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 47 35 39 74 1.575 0.8534 0.8010 2.3811 2.2350
2015-16 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 43 15 16 31 0.721 0.4253 0.3820 2.1652 1.9447
2020-21 Jukurit Liiga 47 7 8 15 0.319 0.7977 0.7977 2.7430 2.7430
2021-22 Jukurit Liiga 17 2 2 4 0.235 0.5883 0.5498 2.0227 1.8902
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SR 33 7 11 18 0.545
2018-19 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 31 3 5 8 0.258
2017-18 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 31 8 5 13 0.419
2016-17 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 35 4 10 14 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.51
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2016-17 · Nebraska Omaha
-21.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3767
Forward overall
#220
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.