← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Sandelin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Hermantown High USHS-MN 25 3 8 11 0.440 0.0557 0.0580 0.1069 0.1113
2015-16 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Penticton Vees BCHL 55 8 13 21 0.382 0.1471 0.1485 0.5556 0.5610
2018-19 Penticton Vees BCHL 51 31 20 51 1.000 0.3853 0.3682 1.4553 1.3908
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Minnesota State D1 BigTen 38 14 15 29 0.763
2021-22 Minnesota State D1 CCHA 41 21 13 34 0.829
2020-21 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SO 27 7 2 9 0.333
2019-20 Minnesota State D1 WCHA FR 22 1 3 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2019-20 · Minnesota State
-25.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22519
Forward overall
#1115
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2006-07
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.