← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Haiskanen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-03-27 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Nürnberg Ice Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Portage Terriers MJHL 58 4 23 27 0.466 0.0896 0.0916 0.2935 0.3001
2016-17 Fargo Force USHL 60 4 24 28 0.467 0.2753 0.2613 1.4017 1.3304
2024-25 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 52 2 8 10 0.192 0.4808 0.5053 1.6304 1.7136
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Cornell D1 ECAC 30 1 5 6 0.200
2020-21 Cornell D1 ECAC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 23 0 3 3 0.130
2018-19 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 20 1 5 6 0.300
2017-18 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 32 2 1 3 0.094
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2017-18 · Cornell
-48.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6012
Defenseman overall
#1181
Defenseman born in 1997

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2016-17
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.