← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Fawcett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 10 0 3 3 0.300 0.1770 0.1775 0.9010 0.9037
2018-19 Powell River Kings BCHL 21 10 10 20 0.952 0.3670 0.3562 1.3860 1.3453
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE 27 16 18 34 1.259
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast 10 1 0 1 0.100
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast 20 5 2 7 0.350
2020-21 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 21 4 5 9 0.429
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 13 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17556
Forward overall
#843
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2011-12
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.