IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Dugan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-24 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Bietigheim Steelers · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Bietigheim Steelers DEL2 51 25 42 67 1.314 0.5667 0.6605 — —
2006-07 Bietigheim Steelers DEL2 51 25 42 67 1.314 0.5667 0.6605 — —
2007-08 Bietigheim Steelers DEL2 51 25 42 67 1.314 0.5667 0.6605 — —
2008-09 Bietigheim Steelers DEL2 51 25 42 67 1.314 0.5667 0.6605 — —
2009-10 Bietigheim Steelers DEL2 51 25 42 67 1.314 0.5667 0.6605 — —
2010-11 Bietigheim Steelers DEL2 51 25 42 67 1.314 0.5667 0.6605 — —
2011-12 Bietigheim Steelers DEL2 51 25 42 67 1.314 0.5667 0.6605 — —
2012-13 Bietigheim Steelers DEL2 51 25 42 67 1.314 0.5667 0.6605 — —
2017-18 Chicago Steel USHL 54 31 35 66 1.222 0.7513 0.7130 3.6008 3.4172
2025-26 Bietigheim Steelers DEL2 51 25 42 67 1.314 0.5667 0.6605 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 34 10 42 52 1.529
2018-19 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 41 10 29 39 0.951
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.64
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.95
2018-19 · Providence
+47.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.