| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Wichita Falls Wildcats | NAHL | 54 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 0.630 | 0.2338 | 0.2474 | 0.6666 | 0.7054 |
| 2008-09 | Wichita Falls Wildcats | NAHL | 47 | 13 | 18 | 31 | 0.660 | 0.2449 | 0.2470 | 0.6984 | 0.7044 |
| 2009-10 | — | NAHL | 45 | 15 | 20 | 35 | 0.778 | 0.2888 | 0.2797 | 0.8235 | 0.7975 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Suffolk | D3 | — | FR | 8 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.625 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.