← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean McKenzie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-12-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 54 15 19 34 0.630 0.2338 0.2474 0.6666 0.7054
2008-09 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 47 13 18 31 0.660 0.2449 0.2470 0.6984 0.7044
2009-10 NAHL 45 15 20 35 0.778 0.2888 0.2797 0.8235 0.7975
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2003-04 Suffolk D3 FR 8 1 4 5 0.625

NCAAe Rankings

#13430
Forward overall
#531
Forward born in 1989
#866
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2007-08
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.