← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Dawe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.1708 0.1913 0.5026 0.5629
2016-17 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 54 19 45 64 1.185 0.3036 0.3249 0.8934 0.9562
2017-18 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 56 23 19 42 0.750 0.4424 0.4380 2.2526 2.2303
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 UConn D1 HockeyEast 16 1 0 1 0.062
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 28 6 5 11 0.393
2020-21 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 16 5 9 14 0.875
2019-20 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 34 9 11 20 0.588
2018-19 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 17 1 6 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2018-19 · Maine
+22.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8356
Forward overall
#360
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Boston College (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.