← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Papa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 8 2 3 5 0.625 0.3980 0.4310 1.8729 2.0281
2011-12 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 47 13 18 31 0.660 0.4200 0.4352 1.9766 2.0480
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 57 21 20 41 0.719 0.4581 0.4503 2.1555 2.1187
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 American International D1 AHA SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 20 1 6 7 0.350
2015-16 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 17 2 3 5 0.294
2013-14 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC FR 37 6 16 22 0.595
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2013-14 · St. Cloud State
+56.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4043
Forward overall
#154
Forward born in 1994
#624
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.