| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 8 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.625 | 0.3980 | 0.4310 | 1.8729 | 2.0281 |
| 2011-12 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 47 | 13 | 18 | 31 | 0.660 | 0.4200 | 0.4352 | 1.9766 | 2.0480 |
| 2012-13 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 57 | 21 | 20 | 41 | 0.719 | 0.4581 | 0.4503 | 2.1555 | 2.1187 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | American International | D1 | AHA | SR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2016-17 | St. Cloud State | D1 | NCHC | JR | 20 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.350 |
| 2015-16 | St. Cloud State | D1 | NCHC | JR | 17 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.294 |
| 2013-14 | St. Cloud State | D1 | NCHC | FR | 37 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 0.595 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.