IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Cox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 57 6 14 20 0.351 0.2235 0.2313 1.0515 1.0882
2012-13 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 62 20 20 40 0.645 0.4109 0.4034 1.9335 1.8981
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Michigan State D1 BigTen SR 35 6 8 14 0.400
2015-16 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 37 11 12 23 0.622
2014-15 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 35 5 15 20 0.571
2013-14 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 36 6 6 12 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2013-14 · Michigan State
+16.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8333
Forward overall
#336
Forward born in 1994
#1333
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Poturalski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Papa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Donny Flynn
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.