IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Schempp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 59 13 22 35 0.593 0.2203 0.2360 0.6281 0.6730
2012-13 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 64 13 28 41 0.641 0.4079 0.4008 1.9197 1.8861
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 41 9 16 25 0.610
2014-15 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 37 10 6 16 0.432
2013-14 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 43 10 15 25 0.581
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2013-14 · Ferris State
+102.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8497
Forward overall
#344
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Andrew Poturalski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Papa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jared Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Donny Flynn
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.