IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Cusin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Brockville Braves CCHL 55 32 40 72 1.309 0.2839 0.2847 1.0126 1.0156
2014-15 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 58 16 31 47 0.810 0.2879 0.2798 0.8547 0.8306
2015-16 — NAHL 58 16 39 55 0.948 0.3369 0.3125 1.0003 0.9279
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen SR 29 16 17 33 1.138
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen — 29 16 17 33 1.138
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen FR 9 4 3 7 0.778
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen — 9 4 3 7 0.778
2017-18 Adrian D3 NCHA — 28 9 15 24 0.857
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 NEHC — 25 16 24 40 1.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.60
2016-17 · UMass Boston
+524.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10913
Forward overall
#451
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Reid Bibb
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Schneider
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Valenti
Utica · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.