← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ashton Calder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Soo Eagles NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 44 10 8 18 0.409 0.1453 0.1566 0.4295 0.4630
2016-17 Surrey Eagles BCHL 49 22 20 42 0.857 0.3302 0.3344 1.2489 1.2649
2017-18 Lincoln Stars USHL 57 13 21 34 0.597 0.3519 0.3319 1.7574 1.6575
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Penn State D1 BigTen 38 10 7 17 0.447
2021-22 North Dakota D1 NCHC 34 11 10 21 0.618
2020-21 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA JR 29 16 13 29 1.000
2019-20 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 41 12 16 28 0.683
2018-19 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 37 5 17 22 0.595
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2018-19 · Lake Superior State
+108.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15174
Forward overall
#697
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2009-10
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.