IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Douglas Beck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-11-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Marquette Rangers NAHL 11 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 53 12 18 30 0.566 0.2079 0.2109 0.5982 0.6068
2010-11 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 55 28 36 64 1.164 0.4275 0.4119 1.2298 1.1848
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Canisius D1 AHA — 33 2 5 7 0.212
2013-14 Canisius D1 AHA — 11 1 4 5 0.455
2012-13 Canisius D1 AHA — 31 5 8 13 0.419
2011-12 Canisius D1 AHA — 32 4 5 9 0.281
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2011-12 · Canisius
-0.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17849
Forward overall
#687
Forward born in 1990
#1015
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy Dawes
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Daxton St. Hilaire
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Dubetz
Marian · 2008-09
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.