← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colton Wolter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 14 3 2 5 0.357 0.1268 0.1409 0.3749 0.4166
2011-12 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 48 4 10 14 0.292 0.1036 0.1100 0.3063 0.3252
2012-13 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 56 11 24 35 0.625 0.2220 0.2246 0.6562 0.6638
2013-14 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 58 12 39 51 0.879 0.3123 0.3003 0.9232 0.8876
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 28 8 16 24 0.857
2016-17 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 28 11 13 24 0.857
2015-16 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 27 1 4 5 0.185
2014-15 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 22 1 4 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2014-15 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
-1.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19503
Forward overall
#663
Forward born in 1993
#1233
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.