IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett D'Andrea Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 39 17 12 29 0.744 0.2761 0.2954 0.7873 0.8423
2012-13 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 52 16 15 31 0.596 0.2214 0.2258 0.6313 0.6437
2013-14 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 62 19 47 66 1.065 0.3038 0.2881 0.8240 0.7813
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SR 41 9 7 16 0.390
2016-17 Bowling Green D1 WCHA JR 39 7 13 20 0.513
2015-16 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 34 4 7 11 0.324
2014-15 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 17 3 1 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2014-15 · Bowling Green
+4.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12661
Forward overall
#523
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Kneeland
Lake Forest · 2003-04
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Hagaman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Rasberg
New England · 2015-16
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.