IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Klee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-10-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Lincoln Stars USHL 54 1 5 6 0.111 0.0655 0.0672 0.3337 0.3422
2018-19 — USHL 64 3 8 11 0.172 0.1014 0.0988 0.5163 0.5029
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Ohio State D1 BigTen — 38 1 4 5 0.132
2022-23 RPI D1 ECAC — 31 1 6 7 0.226
2021-22 RPI D1 ECAC — 36 2 3 5 0.139
2020-21 RPI D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 RPI D1 ECAC FR 21 1 3 4 0.191
2019-20 Rensselaer D1 — FR 21 1 3 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2019-20 · RPI
+134.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18708
Defenseman overall
#2904
Defenseman born in 1999
#3906
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Michalchuk
Middlebury · 2001-02
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Anna
SUNY Cortland · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Horacek
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.