← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradley Stonnell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-07-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Surrey Eagles BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 58 12 26 38 0.655 0.2198 0.2270 0.6063 0.6263
2017-18 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 16 1 1 2 0.125 0.0737 0.0712 0.3754 0.3624
2018-19 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 22 8 15 23 1.046 0.3507 0.3255 0.9675 0.8980
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 26 1 7 8 0.308
2021-22 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 11 2 3 5 0.455
2020-21 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 6 0 2 2 0.333
2019-20 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 10 0 2 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2019-20 · Robert Morris
-5.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5540
Defenseman overall
#1197
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2008-09
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.