IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jay Feiwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 48 5 4 9 0.188 0.0689 0.0741 0.1979 0.2127
2017-18 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 47 8 9 17 0.362 0.1329 0.1363 0.3818 0.3915
2018-19 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 49 14 24 38 0.775 0.2849 0.2794 0.8185 0.8026
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Adrian D3 NCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Denver D1 NCHC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27514
Forward overall
#1426
Forward born in 1999
#2341
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ethan James
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Foulds
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.