IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremy Gabriele Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-10-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1837 0.2034 0.5278 0.5844
2017-18 — NAHL 33 3 1 4 0.121 0.0445 0.0471 0.1279 0.1353
2018-19 — NCDC 38 2 17 19 0.500 0.2039 0.2054 — —
2019-20 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 53 3 13 16 0.302 0.1109 0.1109 0.3187 0.3187
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Endicott D3 CNE — 5 1 1 2 0.400
2020-21 Endicott D1 CNE FR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Endicott D3 CNE — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
62%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9529
Defenseman overall
#1871
Defenseman born in 1999
#3391
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Makarenko
Concordia · 2018-19
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Clements
Augsburg · 2002-03
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Burke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.