| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Niagara Falls PowerHawks | NA3HL | 31 | 36 | 31 | 67 | 2.161 | 0.2712 | 0.2850 | 0.6823 | 0.7170 |
| 2017-18 | Charlotte Rush | USPHL-Premier | 42 | 24 | 28 | 52 | 1.238 | 0.1619 | 0.1629 | 0.4202 | 0.4228 |
| 2018-19 | Corpus Christi IceRays | NAHL | 59 | 22 | 38 | 60 | 1.017 | 0.3736 | 0.3606 | 1.0733 | 1.0359 |
| 2024-25 | EV Landshut | DEL2 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.250 | 0.3349 | 0.3517 | 0.4486 | 0.4711 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | American International | D1 | AHA | SR | 38 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 0.921 |
| 2021-22 | American International | D1 | AHA | JR | 37 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 0.919 |
| 2020-21 | American International | D1 | AHA | SO | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.600 |
| 2019-20 | American International | D1 | AHA | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.