IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Ouellette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 45 18 41 59 1.311 0.1580 0.1617 0.4142 0.4238
2018-19 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 44 16 71 87 1.977 0.2383 0.2313 0.6246 0.6061
2019-20 Maine Nordiques NAHL 48 5 25 30 0.625 0.2321 0.2321 0.6617 0.6617
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Southern Maine D3 NEHC GR 25 1 7 8 0.320
2023-24 Southern Maine D3 NEHC SR 21 1 10 11 0.524
2022-23 Southern Maine D3 NEHC JR 23 2 10 12 0.522
2021-22 Southern Maine D3 NEHC SO 17 2 8 10 0.588
2020-21 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3434
Defenseman overall
#679
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin Vassallo
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelby Lorenz
Southern Maine · 2011-12
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Don Olivieri
Utica · 2010-11
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.