IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rhett Pitlick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-07 Country: USA
2019 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #131  ·  Montreal Canadiens Montreal Canadiens
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Omaha Lancers USHL 7 1 4 5 0.714 0.4391 0.4572 2.1045 2.1915
2019-20 — USHL 45 17 25 42 0.933 0.5737 0.5737 2.7497 2.7497
2020-21 — USHL 43 13 21 34 0.791 0.4860 0.4860 2.3296 2.3296
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 39 13 27 40 1.026
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 39 19 17 36 0.923
2022-23 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 40 11 14 25 0.625
2021-22 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 30 5 13 18 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2021-22 · Minnesota
+53.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

88%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5039
Forward overall
#196
Forward born in 2001
#276
in USHL

D1 Comparables

John Hayden
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Allen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Motte
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alex Roos
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Anderson
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.