IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Daniels Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 48 14 21 35 0.729 0.2055 0.2055 0.5904 0.5904
2020-21 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 34 14 22 36 1.059 0.2984 0.2984 0.8572 0.8572
2021-22 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 50 11 14 25 0.500 0.1857 0.1799 0.5294 0.5130
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 31 16 21 37 1.194
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 31 18 22 40 1.290
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 30 5 15 20 0.667
2022-23 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 27 10 10 20 0.741
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2022-23 · Hobart
+381.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
42%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17091
Forward overall
#576
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alexander Laseen
Curry · 2006-07
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Ford
Elmira · 2015-16
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Damien Kulynych
Fredonia · 2013-14
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.