IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drake Morse Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 48 6 9 15 0.312 0.1110 0.1138 0.3281 0.3363
2022-23 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 58 23 28 51 0.879 0.3123 0.3048 0.9232 0.9010
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Utica D3 UCHC GR 29 17 19 36 1.241
2024-25 Utica D3 UCHC SR 31 13 17 30 0.968
2023-24 Utica D3 UCHC JR 27 6 17 23 0.852
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2023-24 · Utica
+335.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20397
Forward overall
#1104
Forward born in 2002
#1337
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitchell Herlihey
SUNY Oswego · 2013-14
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Boyd
Adrian · 2014-15
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Siebold
Elmira · 2000-01
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.