← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jameson Klein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Lakeville North USHS-MN 8 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Lakeville North USHS-MN 21 7 8 15 0.714 0.0880 0.0880 0.1735 0.1735
2021-22 Lakeville North USHS-MN 26 4 8 12 0.462 0.0569 0.0569 0.1121 0.1121
2022-23 New Mexico Ice Wolves NA3HL 26 8 23 31 1.192 0.1319 0.1362
2023-24 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 47 4 19 23 0.489 0.1131 0.1122
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Tufts D3 NESCAC 17 0 4 4 0.235
2024-25 Tufts D3 NESCAC 24 2 4 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2024-25 · Tufts
+117.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
22%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4859
Defenseman overall
#1262
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Stonehill · 2014-15
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2009-10
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.