IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tucker Poolman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-06-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 59 7 22 29 0.491 0.1947 0.2028 0.5160 0.5374
2012-13 Omaha Lancers USHL 64 14 14 28 0.438 0.2689 0.2561 1.2890 1.2278
2013-14 Omaha Lancers USHL 58 15 26 41 0.707 0.4345 0.3935 2.0827 1.8864
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 38 7 23 30 0.789
2015-16 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 40 5 19 24 0.600
2014-15 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 40 8 10 18 0.450
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2014-15 · North Dakota
+40.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2581
Defenseman overall
#487
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rick Cleaver
Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Master
Stevenson · 2018-19
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.