IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Forry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 29 2 5 7 0.241 0.0303 0.0321 0.0762 0.0808
2023-24 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 47 22 27 49 1.043 0.1308 0.1325 0.3291 0.3333
2024-25 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 39 28 37 65 1.667 0.2092 0.2010 0.5278 0.5137
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 3 3 0.300
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 3 3 0.300
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 3 3 0.300
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 3 3 0.300
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 3 3 0.300
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 3 3 0.300

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19890
Forward overall
#1054
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Gault
Curry · 2005-06
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Luedtke
Concordia · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Bagnole
SUNY Geneseo · 2024-25
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.