IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Oddleifson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-11-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 52 13 22 35 0.673 0.2620 0.2604 0.9816 0.9757
2003-04 — BCHL 58 14 25 39 0.672 0.2617 0.2485 0.9806 0.9311
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Wentworth D3 — SR 18 2 4 6 0.333
2006-07 Wentworth D3 — JR 13 5 4 9 0.692
2005-06 Wentworth D3 — SO 18 7 14 21 1.167
2004-05 Wentworth D3 — FR 21 6 7 13 0.619
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2004-05 · Wentworth
+185.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13467
Forward overall
#510
Forward born in 1983
#1138
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin Callanan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dillon Henningson
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Ehl
New England College · 2005-06
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.