← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devin Rohrich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 32 13 17 30 0.938 0.1226 0.1226 0.3182 0.3182
2021-22 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 43 21 44 65 1.512 0.1977 0.1902 0.5130 0.4935
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 AHA 29 28 22 50 1.724
2024-25 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 AHA 29 28 22 50 1.724
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 27 10 8 18 0.667
2023-24 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 AHA 29 28 22 50 1.724
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 31 10 9 19 0.613
2022-23 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 AHA 29 28 22 50 1.724
2021-22 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 AHA 29 28 22 50 1.724
2020-21 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 AHA 29 28 22 50 1.724

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8331
Forward overall
#362
Forward born in 2001
#312
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2018-19
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.