IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Troy Andrews Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Caledon Admirals OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 — OJHL 53 4 9 13 0.245 0.0601 0.0601 0.1679 0.1679
2020-21 French River Rapids NOJHL 6 2 3 5 0.833 0.1187 0.1187 0.3457 0.3457
2021-22 — USPHL-Premier 42 15 37 52 1.238 0.1397 0.1348 0.4212 0.4063
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SR 23 3 5 8 0.348
2024-25 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC — 19 0 3 3 0.158
2023-24 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC — 19 1 1 2 0.105
2022-23 New England College D3 LittleEast — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18695
Forward overall
#865
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Wiggins
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Otto
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Allen
Marian · 2010-11
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.